This is quite easy to answer.
It's an ugly lump, the "flush mount adaptor" had bad enough comments that I didn't even try. Fortunately, in the Hiroo House, I could put all but the AP17 on the roof
in out of the way places where they didn't exactly scream "GIANT TOADSTOOL ON THE CEILING!"
The AP11D though, mounts to a standard wallbox and even has that rear-entry cable too. All it needs is a dust-cover for the 4 ports on the bottom.
That means with the proper box from Panasonic, it would be flush with the wall. It is also easy to attach and detach as needed. Not so with the AP22, where you have
to struggle with that latch and no matter what you do, they always end up cockeyed.
But all is not bad. Everything, and I mean everything worked flawlessly first time and has now been running for 6 months without a single complaint.
(I also ended up with 20 little wall warts I didn't need...)
------------------------------
Still can't change my name from FL17!
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-01-2022 10:52 PM
From: Jessica Mitchell
Subject: AP25 design flaws!
Hi VAV,
I shared this with my engineering team. Can you provide more insight for us about the issues you have with the design?
------------------------------
Aruba Instant On Communications
Original Message:
Sent: 05-26-2022 05:53 PM
From: Unknown User
Subject: AP25 design flaws!
Why does this AP still require that poorly designed flush mount adapter sleeve and why are you guys still make APs that don't mount to standard device boxes, except AP11D. I'm seriously thinking of switching to Zyxel for a lot of reasons and poor design is a big one and poor cloud management is the second big issue.
Why can I get any AP17's, don't know how many months I've been waiting from Ingram Micro, I've tried SecureWireless and Amazon too.